📄 Workshop: Experiment brainstorming: Existing DAO
1 chunks · Format: csv
Priorities Extracted from This Source
#1
Experimental DAO takeovers to improve governance
#2
Reputation-based compensation and accountability
#3
Multi-house or identity-based voting systems
#4
Preference-intensity signaling through bonds
#5
Improved token distribution and value accrual
#6
Private voting mechanisms
#7
Modernizing civic participation tools for DAOs
#8
Redelegation systems and delegation recall rituals
Document Content
Full text from all 1 processed chunks:
Chunk 0
## Experiment brainstorming: Existing DAO
MetaDAO Takeovers: DAO Takeovers usually are aimed at extracting rent from the treasury. If they are going to get taken over anyway, then do it for the sake of experimentation The goal being, to overwhelm a specific DAO with an injection of what better could look like.
Reputation-based compensation model (promoting accountability and qualitative contributions)
Token-Based DAOs usually want to add voting for some other registry/identity, or adding a second/third "house" for voting. Agora has a protocol that sets this up, such that it works with any identity list. It's our latest experiment: https://www.agora.xyz/blogs/8-oodao-public
Using "Bonds" as a means to gather preference intensity behind ideas. Academia Signals
Better token distribution and value accrual could significantly strengthen token voting as the mechanism to identify ownership and voice
Adding private voting. This feels like an overdue experiment. The trouble is sponsorship.
Modernising tried and tested civic tools like TalkToTheCity and see how that translates to existing DAOs
creating re-delegation systems alongside a ritual of re-delegation (e.g. every 6 months), ideally with some entity having ability to 'call back' delegations