Priority Leaderboard

Priorities anchored in practitioner experience (Harmonica sessions and workshops). Evidence from academic research grouped by stance: supporting, contrasting, or extending.

How scores are calculated

Practitioner-Anchored Scoring

Priorities are set by practitioners. The score reflects how strongly a priority is supported across practitioner sources.

Evidence from Knowledge Commons

Evidence is classified by stance: supporting, contrasting, or extending. Evidence does not affect the score -- it provides context for deliberation.

Recalculating scores...
1
0
Improvement of accuracy in classification
0.40
1 source · Classifying Proposals of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Using Large Language Models
2
0
Building trust in non-dilutive funding
0.40
1 source · CAMF, a New Architecture for Crypto Funding Systems
3
0
Innovative governance designs
0.40
1 source · 7 Governance Experiments That Didn’t End in Chaos
4
0
Cost reduction in data processing
0.40
1 source · Classifying Proposals of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Using Large Language Models
5
0
Establishing a shared taxonomy and metrics
0.40
1 source · CAMF, a New Architecture for Crypto Funding Systems
6
0
Coordination of funding mechanisms
0.40
funding-governance · 1 source · CAMF, a New Architecture for Crypto Funding Systems
Evidence 2 1 1 1
"We need better coordination between grants programs"
"Workshop group identified funding silos as key issue"
"CAMF proposes a new architecture for crypto funding"
"However centralized coordination risks capture"
"Quadratic funding adds a novel dimension"
7
0
Social welfare in funding decisions
0.40
1 source · A Social Choice Analysis of Optimism's Retroactive Project Funding
8
0
Effective funding allocation
0.40
1 source · A Social Choice Analysis of Optimism's Retroactive Project Funding
9
0
Creating a coherent funding strategy
0.40
1 source · CAMF, a New Architecture for Crypto Funding Systems
10
0
Enhancement of voting processes
0.40
1 source · A Social Choice Analysis of Optimism's Retroactive Project Funding
11
0
Improved governance mechanisms
0.40
1 source · A Social Choice Analysis of Optimism's Retroactive Project Funding
12
0
Enhancing builder retention
0.40
1 source · CAMF, a New Architecture for Crypto Funding Systems
13
0
Automation of proposal classification
0.40
1 source · Classifying Proposals of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Using Large Language Models
14
0
Practitioner-driven governance reform
0.00
Evidence 1
"Governance needs to be informed by those doing the work"

New priorities discovered in knowledge commons

These priorities were not raised by practitioners but emerged from academic research.

+
Smart contract governance automation
from evidence
+
Cross-chain treasury management
from evidence